Thoughts on Decolonization: Clare Land

This text is Clare’s presentation from the Decolonisation Forum: From Australia to Israel-Palestine, organised by AJDS in Melbourne on 4 September 2016.  Also on the panel were Prof Gary Foley from Victoria University, Dr Sary Zananiri from Monash University and Niva Grunzweig from Zochrot (

Dr Clare Land is a non-Aboriginal activist and researcher who has been involved in supporting Aboriginal land rights struggles in southeast Australia since 1998. Her acclaimed book, Decolonizing Solidarity: Dilemmas and directions for supporters of Indigenous struggles, is a comprehensive resource about the ways non-Indigenous people can work in solidarity with Aboriginal aspirations today.



There are three ideas I want to contribute tonight. First a couple of thoughts about what decolonizing solidarity means. Then a comment on ‘decolonizing the mind’. Then a comment on how you can really see some of the big questions about white supporters in Australia when you take a look at aspects of solidarity politics in other struggles and places. 



At the outset I want to share what I mean when I talk about decolonizing solidarity – the title of my book; Decolonizing Solidarity: Dilemmas and Directions for Supporters of Indigenous Struggles.

The title pays homage to an earlier book first published in 1999 by Maori scholar Linda Tuhiwai Smith, called Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. No doubt her title pays homage to an earlier book by Kenyan scholar Ngugi Wa Thiongo: Decolonizing the Mind: the Politics of Language in African Literature (1986).

Now, in contrast to the authors of those two books I write as a non-Indigenous person. But I only know the limited amount I know about racism and Indigenous struggles from Black scholars and people of colour, and Aboriginal educators like Gary Foley. So it is appropriate for me to make this very clear in terms of the genealogy of the ideas I peddle by clearly giving credit and paying homage. 

There are two meanings to this title, Decolonizing solidarity.

Firstly, the argument of the book is that the way non-Indigenous people in Australia express support for Aboriginal struggles needs to be decolonized. People of colonial backgrounds who aspire to be supporters of Aboriginal struggles without realising it bring a deep paternalism with them. This needs to be recognised and undone. It undermines and takes energy away from the political agendas of Aboriginal people and dealing with racism also creates a great emotional burden. Beyond that, for Aboriginal people to be educating supporters who are struggling to come to terms with how we might be shaped by the colonizing world that we are a part of and who might be defensive about that is an additional massive burden also.

All this is one reason why it is a lot more powerful for Aboriginal people to do their own thing. So those of you who are non-Aboriginal have to find ways to both be guided by and also not be demanding of Aboriginal people. 

Now, secondly, Decolonizing Solidarity means that solidarity should be decolonizing. Solidarity should be a force for decolonization. Not for reconciliation or other such immaterial movements. So, I am saying that because that is in a nutshell what Aboriginal people from the south east of Australia are saying – and that is the political community in relation to whom this book is written. So, the solidarity of the kind that I write about is about supporting the political agenda of Aboriginal people whose movement is about Land Rights, Self Determination and Economic Independence. The Black GST also came out of this same political community. The Black GST is about Genocide, Sovereignty and Treaty.

So decolonization is about the return of Land and Power. It is about supporting Aboriginal peoples’ struggle for Survival as a distinct people and returning stolen wealth. That is what colonization has been about here in Australia, a settler colony. It has been about eliminating Aboriginal people and settling in their place. If you look at what my forebears did you can see the major techniques of colonization, and then you can work out what the opposite of that is, and what the current political realities are. Taking land and children, snuffing out language, taking over in terms of what laws are in place and in force. Colonization has also tried to lump Aboriginal people into one mass – erasing all the diversity within this continent. Colonization has also appropriated the right to certify who is Aboriginal and who is not. And who is going to be recognised as the owners of a particular place and who is not. All of these things have been resisted but most of these things are the subject of ongoing struggle.

One of the most pragmatic solutions to the current political reality is the notion of Pay the Rent. That is the idea of people of colonial backgrounds paying rent to Aboriginal people for the occupation of this land. As Gary Murray said in an interview for Decolonizing Solidarity: You take Aboriginal people’s land away forever, you pay rent forever. 

One of the things settler Australians also do is assume we have a future in this place. That needs to be confronted too because at the moment there is a great illegitimacy here, a great injustice, and a huge mess. People of colonial backgrounds, myself included, really need to take a good hard look at questions like ownership of land, inheritance, returning land, actively supporting land returns and buy backs, and changing greedy lifestyles that rely on land being ripped up for mining and so on.


So, moving on now to talk about ‘decolonizing the mind’: Many of you will have heard of this phrase and may well be able to imagine into what it probably means. It is about native people’s psychological recovery, unlearning ideas of inferiority and self-hate imposed by colonial processes, and reclaiming cultural pride.

Decolonizing the Mind is the title of an important book by Kenyan scholar Ngugi Wa Thiongo which was published in 1986. Its main concern is the Politics of Language in African Literature, and the importance of farewelling English and French to write in African languages (such as his own – Gikuyu). It addresses the colonial legacy that has remained so strong even after formal decolonization in countries across Africa had occurred. So, it is extremely important to think about material and political decolonization, and not to somehow skip over those things straight to decolonizing the mind.

People of colonial backgrounds are also profoundly shaped by the colonial process and there is a huge amount of work to be done for people like myself to unlearn ideas about Australia and about Aboriginal people that are constantly repeated by dominant cultural sources like media and schools and universities. However, decolonisation is not mainly about attitudinal change, or critique. And it is not a process that is independent from the return of land and power.

There is a very, very important article about this called ‘Decolonization is not a metaphor’ by Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang that is freely available online.


Now let’s take a look at ‘non-normalization,’ one particular aspect of solidarity politics in Israel and Palestine. Because I think when you do that, you can really reflect back on some things here with a
greater sense of cynicism, if you are not wholly cynical already.

I am going to address this by paraphrasing some ideas from my book. And I do invite comments and corrections from Sary Zananiri and people at Zochrot about how I have understood non-normalization and what developments there might have been since.

Non-normalization is a position that criticises and boycotts any collaboration between Palestinians and Israelis that creates the impression that harmony exists or that it can be created without attention to the return of land and refugees. It says that giving the impression of harmony and normal life is deceptive and may mislead outside observers about the real situation.

So, the non-normalisation stance calls for a boycott on activities that bring the two sides together for any reason other than to further the goal of strengthening resistance to the Israeli occupation and all forms of discrimination. That is, until Israel complies with international law and Palestinian rights.

So – there is a lot that could be said and there would be wider debates and views on everything that is connected to this but can I just reflect on that by saying I think it should be particularly interesting to solidarity activists here because I think there are lots of ways in which white support groups make demands on Aboriginal people to ‘be nice’, and to focus on what we want to focus on such as reconciliation, without actually answering a call to support Aboriginal peoples’ more hardcore agendas. We take energy and focus away from the bigger issues like land rights. Now I am sure many people here can mount scathing critiques of Government sponsored reconciliation – but I think no critique sums it up more concisely than that of Robbie Thorpe, who has said, ‘Let’s reconcile the accounts.’


So just some thoughts to wrap up about what you can do.

I’m going to quote Foley here. He has suggested that supporters form into like-minded little groups and affiliate themselves to Aboriginal groups. Your task is to learn as you go, and stay up to date about what needs to be done in support and do it with a minimum of fuss. There are some great little crews around who are really in a good position to be of practical support to rallies and actions: the Street Medics and the Legal Observers group. If they are not happening at the moment then they might need new energy. Or you can just take inspiration and think about what you could do – a screen-printing group, a photocopying group, a postering group, a self-education study group (that also creates events like this – spaces to educate self and others). If you are organised into a group then you can be called upon to be a support to Aboriginal-led campaigner groups.

The important thing here is a group to group relationship. There is something very powerful and good about that because each collective does a lot of its own work to empower each other, reach a shared understanding, and also if necessary, to support, challenge and hold each other accountable. There is a collective spirit in all of it, which is good.

But there are some things you can do when there is no obvious political Aboriginal group doing public stuff. That is not the case at the moment but at times it might be. There is no harm in continuing to educate yourself about Aboriginal struggles of the past and present – that can be done at any time and without asking much of Aboriginal people. It can be done by seeking out any opportunity to hear or see or read things authored by Aboriginal people.  There is also lots of work to be done in getting to know how racism and paternalism works, and in examining how every one of us is shaped by all our transactions with the white dominated world. Anyone of any background is shaped by this – obviously how this impacts on you depends on who you are and the ways in which both oppression and privilege may shape your life. Some people will know well the experience of moving in and out of worlds within the same city.

If you want to know more you can read my book, and one thing that might support and deepen your engagement in the book is to join a Decolonizing Solidarity Book Club group so you can discuss the ideas in the book as you go. Information about all of this is available on my website:

This article appeared in our Just Voices magazine (issue 15, 2018) on Decolonisation and Indigenous Solidarity.